Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 79

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 80

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 81

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 82

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 83

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 84

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 85

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 86

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 87

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 79

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 80

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 81

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 82

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 83

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 84

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 85

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 86

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 87

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 79

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 80

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 81

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 82

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 83

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 84

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 85

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 86

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 87

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 98

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/config.php on line 117

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/sql_layer.php on line 17

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 164

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php:79) in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 186

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/modules.php on line 24

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/modules.php on line 37

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/modules.php on line 37

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/modules.php on line 37

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/modules/News/article.php on line 19

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/config.php on line 117

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 742

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 744

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 746

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 748

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 751

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/header.php on line 15
Unalienable Rights Foundation - Takings and Raisins / Horne v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/meta.php on line 15

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/javascript.php on line 33

Welcome to Unalienable Rights Foundation!


Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 19

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Modules.php on line 64
     Featured
· Home
· AvantGo
· Content
· Downloads
· Members_List
· Stories_Archive
· Surveys
· Top
· Topics
· Web_Links

     What Are/Is

The Unalienable Rights Foundation

Unalienable
V
Inalienable Rights

Dillon Rule

Citizens Guide - Impeachment



Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/blocks/block-Random_Headlines.php on line 19
     Random Headlines

Virginia Supreme Court Decisions
[ Virginia Supreme Court Decisions ]

·What is a Public Record
·Kevin Martingayle Wins Constitutional Law Case Va SC
·Prior Consent by General Assembly to Authority Projects Does Not Violate Separat
·VA's High Court Reigns in Republican Taxation Without Representation
·City Can Not Change Law To Stop Permitted Vested Land Use

     UARF FELLOWS

What is a UARF Fellow 



Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 952

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 953

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 954

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 955

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 952

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 953

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 954

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 955

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 952

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 953

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 954

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 955

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 952

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 953

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 954

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 955

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 952

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 953

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 954

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 955

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 952

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 953

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 954

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 955

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 952

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 953

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 954

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 955

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 952

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 953

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 954

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 955

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 952

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 953

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 954

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 955

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 952

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 953

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 954

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 955

Deprecated: Function ereg_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 978
     CNN LAW
·Court upholds limits on Navy sonar training
·Slain wife accuses husband from the grave
·Prosecutors drop parent-killing case
·Priest accused of lying in mob investigation
·Inmate shot dead after brazen escape
·Juror: Judge and jury pressured me to convict
·Man convicted for Internet hoax death
·Zoloft killer's 30-year sentence appealed
·Girl who shielded mom is a hero at school
·Holloway disappearance hits cold case file

read more...

     Instructions For Replying to Our FOIA

 

Instructions for Responding to
Our FOIA Request to You Click Below



Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 21

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 29

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 29

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 29

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 29

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 29

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 30

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 31

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 32

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 33

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 34

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 35

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 36

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 41

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 42

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 42

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 43

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 44

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 45

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 46

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 47

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 48

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/includes/counter.php on line 49

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 792

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/config.php on line 117

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 742

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 744

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 746

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 748

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 751
 Takings and Raisins / Horne v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

Supreme Court Decisions

Cornell University Law School

Horne v. U.S. Department of

Agriculture

Issues 

Do the Department of Agriculture’s regulations—requiring that a percentage of raisin crops be “reserved” for the government to use to control supply—constitute a taking necessitating just compensation?

Oral argument: 
April 22, 2015

This case presents the Supreme Court with the opportunity to clarify what constitutes a taking. The Hornes argue that the Marketing Order, requiring raisin handlers to deliver a reserve portion of a growers’ crop to the government, constitutes a categorical taking under the Fifth Amendment. The Department of Agriculture, on the other hand, argues that the reserve requirement is simply a time-use limitation that is lawful and does not require just compensation under the Fifth Amendment. This case will have important implications for property owners generally, and will affect the government’s options regarding how to regulate agriculture in ways to protect producers and consumers. 

Questions as Framed for the Court by the Parties 

  1. Whether the government's “categorical duty” under the Fifth Amendment to pay just compensation when it “physically takes possession of an interest in property,” Arkansas Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 511, 518 (2012), applies only to real property and not to personal property.
  2. Whether the government may avoid the categorical duty to pay just compensation for a physical taking of property by reserving to the property owner a contingent interest in a portion of the value of the property, set at the government’s discretion.
  3. Whether a governmental mandate to relinquish specific, identifiable property as a “condition” on permission to engage in commerce effects a per se taking.


Facts 

In 1949, Respondent Department of Agriculture promulgated the Marketing Order Regulating the Handling of Raisins Produced from Grapes Grown in California (“Marketing Order”) under authority of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (“AMAA”). The purpose of the Marketing Order (codified at 7 C.F.R. § 989) is to stabilize the supply of raisins from year to year, in order to make the market, and thus the prices, for raisins more predictable.  

In order to achieve this goal, handlers of raisins are required to divert a certain percentage of their crop, received from producers, each year to a reserve. The Raisin Administrative Committee (“RAC”) determines this percentage, known as the “reserve tonnage.” In contrast to the “free tonnage,” which can be “sold on the open market,” the diverted raisins are disposed of by the RAC in various ways, sometimes via sale in noncompetitive markets. After administrative costs are deducted, producers receive a pro-rata share of the remaining proceeds. The amount of money distributed each year varies: in some years it “is significant; in other years it is zero.” Additionally, in selling the diverted raisins, the RAC has a duty to sell the raisins in a way that maximizes producer returns. If a producer does not divert the proper percentage of raisins, the Secretary of Agriculture may impose a penalty subject to administrative and judicial review.

Petitioners Marvin and Laura Horne (collectively “the Hornes”) are raisin producers who, being “dissatisfied with what they viewed as an out-dated regulatory regime,” attempted to structure their operation so that the Marketing Order would not apply to their raisin crop. Typically, raisin producers sell their harvest to a handler, who “stems, sorts, cleans or seeds” them. The handler is then responsible for diverting the required percentage of raisins to the reserve pool. The Hornes, however, decided that after producing their raisins, they would perform the traditional functions of a handler, both with respect to their own raisins and the raisins of a number of other producers, without acquiring title. They believed that they would not fit the definition of a “handler” as defined in the Marketing Order, and therefore would not be required to divert any raisins to the reserve. For the 2002-03 and 2003-04 seasons, the Hornes did not reserve the required 47 percent and 30 percent of their raisin crop as set by the RAC for those years, respectively.

While the Hornes thought their business model would allow them to forgo the reserve requirement, the Secretary of Agriculture determined that the Marketing Order did in fact apply to them. Following administrative proceedings, a U.S.D.A. Judicial Officer found the Hornes liable for several regulatory violations, including a failure to divert the necessary raisins, and imposed a monetary penalty of $695,226.92. The Hornes sought review of that agency decision in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (“district court”). In court, the Hornes argued they were not “handlers” as defined by the Marketing Order, and also that “the agency's order violated the Takings Clause [under the Fifth Amendment] and the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against excessive fines.” The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Agriculture.

The Hornes, thereafter, appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (“Ninth Circuit”), whichaffirmed the district court’s decision with respect to the Hornes’ statutory claims and Eight Amendment claim, and further held that the court did not have jurisdiction over the Horne’s Takings claim. The Hornes then sought certiorari, successfully, in the United States Supreme Court.  

In 2013, Horne v. Department of Agriculture, the Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit, held that the court did have jurisdiction over the Takings claim, and remanded the case for a determination of the merits of that claim. Later, on remand, the Ninth Circuit held that the raisin diversion program did not constitute a constitutional taking under theFifth Amendment, and affirmed the district court’s decision. The Hornes again sought certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, which the Court subsequently granted on January 16, 2015.

Discussion 

In this case, the Supreme Court will determine whether the Marketing Order, which requires that a percentage of a crop be set aside into a reserve pool, effects a taking. The Hornes argue that the Marketing Order constitutes a categorical taking under the Fifth Amendment and, thus, requires just compensation. The Department of Agriculture, on the other hand, argues that the reserve tonnage requirement, as set by the RAC, is simply a time-use limitation that is lawful and does not require just compensation under the Fifth Amendment. The Court’s resolution of this case will have important implications, not just for the Hornes, but also for agricultural producers and for the property rights of people generally.

EFFECTS ON PROPERTY RIGHTS GENERALLY

The Chamber of Commerce, in support of the Hornes, worries that if the raisin diversion program does not constitute a constitutional taking, there will be negative practical effects on “property rights in a broad range of contexts.” For instance, the Chamber of Commerce argues that a factual, ad hoc approach to determining whether a regulatory taking has occurred puts substantial burdens on property owners and will diminish predictability and certainty about what constitutes a taking. Moreover, the CATO Institute, also in support of the Hornes, asserts that upholding the Ninth Circuit’s decision will allow the government to manipulate the takings doctrine, because the government can avoid a successful takings challenge by simply giving the property owner a contingent interest in the taken property. Thus, the government could simply characterize a public benefit as a contingent interest, effectively taking property without providing compensation according to the CATO institute.

The Department of Agriculture, on the other hand, believes that the Marketing Order does not amount to a government taking and that upholding it will not have dire consequences on takings jurisprudence. For one thing, the Department of Agriculture submits, the Marketing Order does not apply to “any raisins a producer choses to retain for his own consumption or for any other reasons.” Rather, it only affects raisins heading to market, according to the Department of Agriculture, and the “government has traditionally exercised a high degree of control over commercial dealings concerning personal property.” Additionally, the Department of Agriculture asserts that producers, under the Marketing Order, retain the most important right regarding their raisins sent to the reserve: “the right to receive net proceed from the sale of that portion of their fungible commodity.”

EFFECTS ON THE RAISIN AND OTHER AGRICULTURE INDUSTRIES

The DKT Liberty Project and several independent raisin growers in support of the Hornes (collectively “DKT Liberty Project”) argue that the Marketing Order places a severe burden on independent raisin producers—with little benefit to them—while at the same time introducing uncertainty to the industry. Additionally, the DKT Liberty Project asserts that, because the Marketing Order is similar to many other agricultural orders in California, the Supreme Court’s decision will impact regulation of other crops, and therefore, producers of other crops in California. The DKT Liberty Project claims that if the Supreme Court does not find the Marketing Order to constitute an unconstitutional taking, the government will be incentivized to institute more severe regulations on agriculture, or even to apply these types of regulations to producers of manufactured goods.

The Department of Agriculture counters that if the raisin diversion program is a constitutional taking, the government will be limited in its ability to protect producers and consumers, because dealing with takings issues would disrupt the government’s ability to regulate. This is especially important in the raisin industry where, according to the Department of Agriculture, “supply can vary dramatically from year to year” and generate large price swings. Accordingly, the Department of Agriculture argues, to implement a per se rule—“that any regulation that affects possessory rights triggers a per se taking”—would disregard the benefits that the reserve program brings to raisin producers. These benefits include, according to Sun-Maid in its earlier amicus brief in the 2013 Horne case, “avoiding [the] price volatility that was endemic prior to promulgation of the raisin marketing order,” which “benefits the entire raisin industry.”

Analysis 

The Supreme Court is confronted for a second time with this dispute between the Hornes and the Department of Agriculture. However, in this case, the Court must now grapple with whether the Marketing Order constitutes a property “taking” under the Fifth Amendment. Additionally, if a property taking has occurred, the Court must consider whether there is sufficient compensation for raisin producers, or whether this issue should be remanded.

The Hornes argue that the Marketing Order constitutes a categorical—or “per se”—taking of their property under the Fifth Amendment. They specifically argue that the Marketing Order requires that a portion of all raisin crops be segregated and held by the government. This requirement, according to Horne, interferes with the Hornes’ dispositional control of their raisins, and requires sufficient compensation. The Hornes further contend that there are no sufficient provisions at law that justly compensate the Hornes for their financial losses due to the Marketing Order.  

The Department of Agriculture, on the other hand, argues that the Marketing Order cannot be construed as a categorical taking under the Fifth Amendment. Instead, the Department of Agriculture contends, the Marketing Order can best be construed as a usage restriction, which is subject to a balancing test that favors the government’s purposes to constrain unfettered raisin sales. Nevertheless, the Department of Agriculture insists, even if such a usage restriction could be viewed as a property taking, the Tucker Act provides clear and reasonable means for raisin producers to be compensated for reserve raisins held by the Department of Agriculture under the Marketing Order.

WHAT CONSTITUTES A FIFTH AMENDMENT TAKING?

The Hornes argue that the Marketing Order constitutes a categorical taking under the Fifth Amendment. The Hornes explain that the Marketing Order requires raisin producers to relinquish possessory and dispositional control over their raisins. The loss of control is especially evident, the Hornes argue, because the Marketing Order requires that producers physically segregate “reserve” raisins, which are then transferred to the government’s Raisin Administrative Committee(“RAC”) for holding and distribution. This physical intrusion into the Hornes’ raisin crop, the Hornes contend, constitutes a per se taking under the Supreme Court’s decision in Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.

The Department of Agriculture urges that the Hornes improperly read Loretto and Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council to expand what constitutes a “taking.” 
Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/config.php on line 117

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 742

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 744

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 746

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 748

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 751

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/config.php on line 117

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 742

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 744

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 746

Deprecated: Function eregi_replace() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 748

Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/mainfile.php on line 751
     Related Links
· More about Supreme Court Decisions
· News by editor


Most read story about Supreme Court Decisions:
The Unalienable Rights Foundation Admonishes COSETO


     Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


     Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

 Send to a Friend Send to a Friend



Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/modules/News/associates.php on line 19
Associated Topics

Civil  RightsLaw and Order Recipes for SolutionsManual of the ConstitutionOrganic Documents


Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/modules/News/comments.php on line 19

Deprecated: Function eregi() is deprecated in /home/content/40/6020740/html/uarf.us/footer.php on line 15




Web site powered by Web Hosting USA

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © MM - MMXIII by the UnAlienable Rights Foundatation.

Google
WWW http://www.uarf.us

You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php or ultramode.txt
Copyright, MMVIII, Unalienabe Rights Foundation (UARF), All Rigths Reserved
Page Generation: 0.31 Seconds